THE CENTRE CODES OF THE BUSH BARROW LOZENGE.

We have touched briefly upon codes occurring from the centre fulcrum position of the Clandon Barrow Lozenge and will now probe the Bush Barrow Lozenge to see if the same modus operandi was employed in its coding. It will be remembered that the width of the Clandon Barrow inner diamond was 1.701 inches (lunar code), with a length of 2.3328 inches (dual coded as 2.33333 inches). The centre diamond of the Bush Barrow lozenge carries the exact same width code (1.701 inches), but its length is reduced by 1.6 and achieves 1.458 inches (lunar code). This can also be interpreted as 1.45833333 inches for overland distance use and both numbers are mnemonically representative of the length of the ancient Greek Pygon measurement (14.58 inches), in either lunar or overland distance guises.

The circles expanding out from the centre of the Bush Barrow Lozenge were set to very meaningful radius or diameter values, which are found encoded into ancient structures from Egypt to New Zealand. Again, all circles shown were precisely measured within AutoCAD, over a correctly scaled drawing of the Bush Barrow Lozenge artefact. Here are the codes that the original artisan placed into the centre section of the lozenge memory device:

The 4 pattern line positions (edges of the 3 raised, incised humps), in 4 quadrants, comply to the following radii:

OTHER INCH RADIUS CODES AT THE 2ND, 3RD AND 4TH PATTERN POINTS (INNER DIAMOND).

The lozenge was a memory device, used for the recall of numerical values. It seems that, like an accountant's ledger book, it should tally up between at least 3 station points in each quadrant... those stations being:

Certainly, the distance of length, pattern point to pattern point across the entire lozenge, seems to have been set at a recognisable, accumulative, coded value. However, it's unlikely that this tremendously difficult to achieve design feature had to apply to every consecutive coded distance amongst the inner diamonds, as the codes fall into quite different number families. An "11" series number is unlikely to produce a significant ratio value, for example, when added to a "6&7" series number, etc. It seems more likely that circle geometry coded values were achieved from the "owl eyes" stations, then subtlety adjusted to give the most precise possible mnemonic readings from other stations. The reader of the lozenge would visually detect, for example, that a station sat at .79 of an inch from a fulcrum station and would immediately think of 7920 leagues...the equatorial circumference of the Earth under the "11" series system. A station hovering around 1.57 would mean 1.575 and 1.5708 simultaneously, the full numbers having been learned by rote and repetition from "Masters of the Craft".

LEFT SIDE OF THE LOZENGE.

THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE LOZENGE.

THE OVERALL LENGTH OF THE LOZENGE, OUTER TIP TO OUTER TIP.

Although measurements supplied by Mr. Paul Robinson of the Devizes Museum are only correct to the last millimetre (+ or -), it can be safely assumed that the astronomer/ artisan who fabricated the lozenge intended that it achieve a length of 7.29 inches. From the centre of the lozenge to the left end point should have achieved 3.6525 inches. This was in homage to the solar year @ 365.25 days. The length, therefore, requires that the distance from the outmost pattern point to the end exterior point be .0525 inches. This very important increment was the basis of many ancient measurement systems and, on the inner rim of the Sarsen Circle lintels at Stonehenge, 5.25 inches represented 1/2 a degree of arc.

The length to the right from the centre of the lozenge could be read in two main ways. It was either 3.564 inches + .081 inches or 3.54375 inches + .09375 inches. The 9375 mathematical progression was very important to compass and lunar determinations or navigation under the "11" series of numbers.

The entire diameter, in inches, is read as a string of accumulative codes in any of the following, perfect combinations of significant ancient numbers and useful ratio values:

There is some clever sharing, juggling or substitution of coded values to the left & right or overall, which introduces many very important mathematical progression values, like .10125 (lunar, navigation). The fact that every number in the above list was essential to ancient lunar, solar or navigational functions suggests strongly that this was the ancient, combined set of numbers built into the length of the Bush Barrow lozenge.

THE TOP OF THE LOZENGE TO THE BOTTOM.

It seems obligatory that the width of the Bush Barrow Lozenge and the length of the Clandon Barrow Lozenge were meant to be 6.18034 inches, outer edge to outer edge. The true dimension, in each case, might have been set to what was visually achievable at around 6.18 inches. This value (based upon PHI...10 inches ÷ 1.6180339) was the foundation formula for the fabrication of all "official" ancient circular volume vessels used by the cousin nations of the Mediterranean and, by association, Europe. By use of this value, all "official standard" vessels, cups or tubs would equate to exact cubic measures. Those exact and precise volumes could then be transferred (poured) into other robust, sturdy, conveniently shaped and sized "amphora" jars, used for trading liquid or dry measure goods around the Mediterranean Basin, or overland across Continental Europe and Africa. The Bush Barrow and Clandon Barrow lozenges, conceivably, were used for checking the integrity of "bushel" volume tubs in the ancient Wessex marketplaces to ensure that merchants were dispensing correct measures to their customers. A correct bushel tub would accommodate exactly 3 widths of the Bush Barrow Lozenge or 3 lengths of the Clandon Barrow Lozenge across its circular base.

THE REMAINING 3 CODES AT THE TOP OF THE INNER DIAMOND.

THE REMAINING CODES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE INNER DIAMOND.

Beyond the foregoing diameters listed for circles within this section, individual values can be multiplied or divided by companion values to create square inch areas or ratios for use in astronomical or navigational determinations

.

The diameter width (red circle) of the 2nd diamond is 3.024 inches. This width is in homage to the perimeter value of the Great Pyramid (3024 feet...1/2 a minute of Earth equatorial circumference arc under the pyramid's "6&7" geodetic system....or 3025 feet...1/2 a minute of arc under the "11" series system). The length of the diamond (blue circle) is 3.52 inches (1.76 radius). This is accentuating the "11" series navigational system, incorporating the league (16500 feet), mile (5280 feet), furlong (660 feet), chain (66 feet), rod/ perch (16.5 feet), fathom (5.5 feet) and link (7.92 inches). The yellow circle, sitting adjacent to the outer blue circle, is 3.5 inches wide (1.75 radius). This code would also have been included, as it provides an important conversion ratio for elevating 7th segments of a 360 degree circle into whole number values in a 630-degree circle. Therefore, 51.42857143 -degrees X 1.75 = 90.


The 4 pattern line positions (edges of the 3 raised, incised humps), in 4 quadrants, comply to the following radii:

SYSTEM 1. AN EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE OF 25000 MILES.

The rod for this system would be 20.833333 inches X 1200 = 25000 (read as miles).

The 25000-mile circumference concept was, probably, only ever a convenient way of describing the approximate circumference of the Earth. Under this calibration the Earth would be 132000000 feet in equatorial circumference, which is an excess on the modern, accepted circumference (24902-miles) by 98-miles.

SYSTEM 2: AN EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE OF 24883.2-MILES.

The rod for this system would be 20.736 inches X 1200 = 24883.2 (read as miles).

This is, plausibly, the ancient "true" size of the equatorial circumference (12 X 12 X 12 X 12 X 1.2-miles). One second of arc for this circumference would be 101.376 feet, and that's the width of the stybolite platform upon which the Parthenon of Athens sits. Ancient surveying markers, still intact in the Waitapu Valley of Northern New Zealand, sit 12441.6 feet distant from each other (12441.6 X 2 = 24883.2). These were anciently erected by New Zealand's now extinct "Stonebuilder" population.

SYSTEM 3: AN EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE OF 24857.95455-MILES.

The rod for this system would be 20.71496212 inches X 1200 = 24857.95455 (read as miles).

This is a shared Egyptian, Greek and Roman system that works in progressions of the number "7". It seems to be founded upon 5000 Egyptian Atur of 26250 feet each (5 Greek miles). One of the concepts of ancient metrology, which survived into mediaeval times, was that 75 Roman miles represented 1-degree of arc for the world, although scholars of the time had, seemingly, no lingering knowledge of the actual, former length of a Roman foot...until professor of geometry, John Greaves did a careful reassessment, in Rome, in 1639AD.

If we multiply a foot of 11.66666 inches X 5000 we get a Roman mile of 58333.3333-inches (or 1000 Roman Paces). If 75 such Roman miles represent 1-degree of arc for the world, then that equates to 4375000-inches or 364583.33333 British feet of 12-inches each. This value, multiplied by 360 = 131250000 British feet or 135000000 Roman feet. These lengths are also 12500000 Hebrew Reeds of 10.5 feet each or 125000000 Greek feet of 12.6-inches each. Essentially, this very plausible coded representation for the size of the Earth is a purely "7" series way of calibrating the equatorial circumference. The sum of 131250000 feet equals 24857.955455 British miles, 27000 Roman miles or 25000 Greek miles. This same circumference was probably 5000 Egyptian Atur of 26250 British feet each. The 131250000 British feet calibration does not work at all well according to the 5280 feet mile, which is an "11" series numerical progression. It does, however, break down very well into degrees, minutes and seconds of arc under the Egyptian, Assyrian, Greek, Hebrew or Roman "7" series measurement increments.

SYSTEM 4: AN EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE OF 24750-MILES.

The rod for this system would be 20.625 inches X 1200 = 24750 (read as miles).

This was, undoubtedly, a much used system and the most popular for "straight line" sailing, as it's founded upon an "11" series of numbers and became the basis of the ancient British league (16500 feet), mile (5280 feet), furlong (660 feet), chain (66 feet), rod/ perch (16.5 feet), fathom (formerly 5.5 feet) and link (7.92 inches) measurement system. Under this early Egyptian system the Great Pyramid was considered to have a base perimeter of 3025 feet (55 squared) instead of 3024 feet. This method of reading the Great Pyramid required the symbolic elongation of each side by 3 inches, such that they would comply to "11" series numbers and 3025 feet was called 1/2 a minute of equatorial circumference arc for the Earth.

SYSTEM 5: AN EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE OF 24741.81818-MILES.

The rod for this system would be 20.61818182 inches X 1200 = 24741.81818 (read as miles).

This is the "literal" Great Pyramid system for calibrating the size of the Earth in a combined "6 & 7" mathematical progression reading (based upon the number 42). It appears to have been the most used system, in consideration of the "6& 7" measuring capability built into all known measurement standards of the ancient Mediterranean Basin. Although the "7" based measurements disappeared from general use in Britain during the latter Christian era, the "6" and "11" based measurements remained. The ancient "7" based Mediterranean measurements are found, however, to be strongly represented in the Bush Barrow and Clandon Barrow lozenges, indicating that such measurements were alive and well in England when the lozenges were fabricated.

Under the "6 & 7" system the Great Pyramid's perimeter was read as 3024 feet and this represented 1/2 a minute of equatorial arc for the Earth. The circumference of the Earth was read as 130636800 feet and this broke down very fluidly into degrees (362880 feet...the literal perimeter measurement of the Great Pyramid was 36288 inches), minutes (6048 feet...two circuits of the Great Pyramid was 6084 feet) and seconds (100.8 feet... the inner diameter of one section of the slightly elliptical Sarsen circle at Stonehenge is 100.8 feet). The 6, 7, and 11 systems were wonderful to navigate by, converting linear distances covered into easily decipherable chart plotting circles that would break down into degrees, minutes and seconds of arc. Under these systems, calculating degree angles from point of departure to destination was simple to accomplish and the relative position of the ship could always be known.

SYSTEM 6: AN EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE OF 24711.79047-MILES.

The rod for this system would be 20.59315873 inches X 1200 = 24711.79047 (read as miles).

The Great Pyramid was built in such a way that all of its dimensions could be read (symbolically) according to PHI increments. The literal dimensions of the Great Pyramid break down into increments of 1.62 inches and the PHI ratio is 1.6180339 (rounding upward to 1.62). This duality of reading is found on many European/ Mediterranean/ Indus Valley/ American/ Oceanic monuments of antiquity, where the dimensions can be read in either rounded PHI or pure PHI increments. This is certainly true of Stonehenge. The Great Pyramid's length could be read as 280 rounded Megalithic Yards (of 32.4 inches...756 feet...literal length) or 280 true Megalithic Yards of 32.360678 inches (755.0824867 feet...symbolic PHI length). This would mean that 1/2 a minute of equatorial arc, under the pyramid's pure PHI assignment, would be 3020.329947 feet.

The PHI ratio was difficult to work with, due to the complex numbers it produced, nevertheless the ancient mathematicians found several methods to "tame" PHI and one of these was to use (at least) "rounded PHI" in all or most major building applications. Many statuettes or panels of antiquity incorporated pure PHI dimensions. The majority of circles at Stonehenge (except where carrying other types of coding...such as in the case of "Z" Holes) are in a pure PHI relationship to each other, but reduce in whole number diameters (466, 288, 178, 110 feet respectively, etc.) in a clever numerical manipulation of PHI.

This is a picture of the huge Octagon of Newark Ohio, redrawn exactly to scale in AutoCAD over an official survey map. The 1958 survey was conducted by Abrams Aerial Survey Corporation of Lansing, Michigan for the City of Newark, Ohio. The official survey charts were donated to this researcher for "Octagon analysis" by researcher Patricia Mason of Newark, Ohio http://greatserpentmound.org/articles/giants.html . The coloured lines appearing on this above drawing show how the selfsame angle, length and Earth equatorial values, encoded in micro-scale within the Clandon Barrow and Bush Barrow lozenges, were encoded in macro-scale within the giant Octagon, geometric earth embankment complex. Here's an explanation of what the coloured lines mean:

THE EQUATORIAL CODES FALLING ONTO THE SMALL MOUND PENINSULA AT THE OCTAGON.

THE GATEWAY CODES AT THE OCTAGON.

The primary purpose of the small mound was related to special codes running between the other small inner mounds and this geodetic coding seems to have been a secondary function. The more generally used Earth equatorial circumference codes, lending themselves very fluidly to world navigation, were separated out and placed into the gateway. These were accompanied by the PHI equatorial coding system, which was probably only ever used in certain scientific calculations to do with PHI harmonics in nature (the way nature works). Let's look at these other systems, situated over in the gateway.

Lines within the Octagon, originating at the centre of a very important, small embankment circle situated exterior to the Octagon. The black line represents the PHI coding of the equatorial circumference. The blue line represents the Great Pyramid's "6&7" equatorial assignment. The magenta line represents the "11" series equatorial assignment. The Green line represents the "Roman" "7" series equatorial assignment. The red line represents the "true" equatorial assignment. The yellow line represents the largest assignment of 25000 miles.

THE DIAMOND POINTS ON THE BUSH BARROW LOZENGE... TO THE LEFT.

THE DIAMOND POINTS TOP.

THE DIAMOND POINTS TO THE RIGHT.

THE DIAMOND POINTS BOTTOM.

Moving outward to the next diamond, which gives 3 closely associated codes in the width of the diamond top to bottom (combined circles blue, yellow, green). The code to the top of the diamond is 2.24 inches radius. This value provides a mathematical progression that applies to navigation under the Great Pyramid "6&7" Earth equatorial circumference assignment. A progression incorporating 2240 was adopted by King Henry VII after 1527 AD for the new English ton and associated weights, which had also been used earlier in Egypt. The ancient Egyptians used a "Sep" of 7000 grains, the same as King Henry VII's pound.

The 4 outer points of the diamond swing close to the zigzagging "V" chevrons and stations on the points of the chevrons provide 2 further dynamic codes. One of these is 2.25 inches, which was used copiously in the 360-degree compass system. The sum of 22.5-degrees would be 1/8th of a 360-degree circle.

Perhaps the most important value, positively coded into this section, is a circle (green) with a radius of 2.268 inches (4.536 inches diameter). The circle sweeps to the points of the chevron, top and bottom and has been very carefully encoded. The Great Pyramid's flat altar floor was mathematically calculated to sit at a vertical height of 453.6 feet. A rule of 3,4,5 triangles was applied to achieve this height, wherein the pyramid's base length (756 feet) was divided by 1.66666 to achieve 453.6 feet. In all 3,4,5 triangles one side will always be 1.666666 less than the hypotenuse. It is in the pyramid's length assignments, as opposed to it's vertical height assignments, that the codes for the size of the Earth are found, as well as the formula for correctly fashioning individual Egyptian Royal Cubits that comply to particular Earth size assignments in different number families.

The radius length of the diamond is 2.66666 inches or 5.333333 inches in diameter (red circle). It will be remembered that the 1.0666666 ratio (15/16ths conversion formula) was very important to ancient astronomers and 5.333333 is half of 10.6666666. This same width aspect of the diamond was also read as 2.64 inches radius and 5.28 inches diameter (yellow circle), for coding the "11" series overland distance system (5280 feet in a mile).

The 4 pattern line positions (edges of the 3 raised, incised humps), in 4 quadrants, comply to the following radii:

THE OTHER PATTERN POINT CODES

The length of the 3rd outward diamond is, as stated, 5.33333 inches, for a radius of 2.666666 inches. The other stations are:

The width of the 3rd outward diamond is, as stated 4.48 inches, for a radius of 2.24 inches. The other stations are:

The final section of the Bush Barrow Lozenge. We have already discussed the string of codes running through the length of the lozenge and will now discuss the width codes, top to bottom. The overall distance (red circle) was 6.1804 inches. The upper tip of the lozenge, especially, appears to be slightly rounded and it would appear to have suffered some impact damage. If one follows the natural edge lines on each side, they indicate that a slight elongation of the lozenge is reasonable to bring it to a much improved point. Here's how the code string runs from top to bottom.

CIRCLES TOUCHING THE OUTERMOST DIAMOND PATTERN LINES.

THE PATTERN POINT CODES.

At the outermost pattern point sets, the artisan, engaged in marking the gold sheet, added considerable extra coding. This was done by allowing a diagonal line, coming from the left or right, to not meet at a common intersection. A line coming up from the left, for example, might terminate at a slightly more outlying position. It's obvious that the astronomer/ artisan was "packing in" as many close proximity codes as possible. Here are the identifiable codes residing in each quadrant:

LEFT POINTS @ 270-DEGREES.

TOP POINTS @ 0 - 360-DEGREES.

The right hand side of the lozenge is particularly laden with extra codes, as a much magnified, high resolution photo of the lozenge will verify. Under magnification it is seen that lines from separate quadrants, which should, technically, intersect, don't do so but sit at staggered, extended points from each other. Here is the result of assessing the positions within the exacting confines of AutoCAD.

RIGHT SIDE POINTS @ 90-DEGREES.

THE BOTTOM POINTS @ 180-DEGREES.

TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH.

Here in New Zealand, at the furthest reaches of the globe, an ancient purpose placed tor mound, situated upon the northern ridge of the Waitapu Valley, sits 7000 Hebrew/ Celtic Royal Cubits from a laboriously carved, surveying "benchmark cleft" on the sea cliff.. The azimuth angle from this equally ancient benchmark cleft, to the southern face of the tor mound, is 51.84 degrees (the slope angle of the Great Pyramid or azimuth angle through the centre of the huge Octagon earth embankment complex of Newark, Ohio).

At the same time, the northern ridge tor mound centre sits 11520 feet from the southern hubstone of the very impressive Waitapu standing stone observatory, on an azimuth angle of 59.0625-degrees. Half of this value is 29.53125 and that happens to be the number of days in a lunar year. The rising, diagonal face length to the apex of Khafre Pyramid, under the 3,4,5 triangle rule by which it was built, was 590.625 feet...half of which is the azimuth angle between the centre of the northern tor mound and the huge hubstone at Puketapu Hill's lower observatory site.

The line from the observatory to the northern ridge tor mound turns 120 degrees and goes for 11520 feet to a standing stone marker on Puketapu Hill, where there's another large observatory composed of about 200 cairns. At the Puketapu Hill marker the line turns 120-degrees and runs for 11520 feet to the southern hubstone of the Waitapu Observatory, forming a perfect equilateral triangle. The 11520 feet distance on each side of the triangle is .8 of a Geomancer's mile from ancient Britain.

Another line extends for 12500 feet from the northern ridge tor mound to the huge hubstone of Puketapu Hill's lower plateau alignment site. The azimuth angle of this line is 295.3125-degrees, again accentuating the 29.53125-days in the lunar month. Under the largest "10" series, ancient calibration, which viewed the size of the Earth as 25000 miles of equatorial circumference, this distance would represent 1/10560th part (2/5280ths). If the 12500 feet were called miles, then this distance would mnemonically code half of the equatorial circumference. A cairn, 100 feet beyond the hubstone, marks a distance of 12600 feet from the northern ridge tor mound, or 1200 Hebrew Reeds. This distance is 1/10368th or 2/5184ths of the equatorial circumference under the Great Pyramid geodetic assignment.

The distance from the huge hubstone on Puketapu Hill's lower overland alignment site to the southern hubstone of the Waitapu Observatory is 11340 feet, at an azimuth angle of 172.8-degrees. The 11340 feet distance is a very prominent lunar code. It is the exact distance equivalent of 15 sides of the Great Pyramid or 16 sides of the Khafre Pyramid, on the Giza Plateau of Egypt. The 11340 distance is in mnemonic reference to a day count interval within the 6804-day lunar nutation cycle (major standstill to major standstill) wherein 1134-days equals 1/6th of that period. The width of the Station Stones rectangle at Stonehenge is 113.4 feet. The azimuth angle of 172.8-degrees carries one of the most significant navigational principles of antiquity in its numerical value.

Yet another line runs for 11520 feet from a giant, purpose place obelisk stone near Puketapu Hill, to a yet larger tor mound on the southern ridge of the Waitapu Valley...etc., etc.

There remain many coded stations on, especially, the Clandon Barrow Lozenge, which this series of articles has neglected to analyse thus far. The Clandon Barrow Lozenge, despite the fact that it's slightly smaller than the Bush Barrow Lozenge, contains many more codes.

The truth against the world.


June 2003. ©